Reflexivity and agency in contemporary sociological theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4013/2348Abstract
The article discusses some of the contributions of contemporary sociological theory to the debate on agency and on reflexivity and traces the position of relevant authors in the current theoretical production regarding the work of the sociologist and the role ofsociology. The discussion is developed through the idea of spectrum, along which different theories are positioned according to the capacity of agency and of reflexivity ascribed to the actors. “Capacity of agency and reflexivity” refers to the level of consciousness,reflection, autonomy and the capacity of producing effects ascribed to the actor. The spectrum would be configured, using Garfinkel’s (1967) concepts as analytical tools, at one of the poles by the concept of “cultural dope” and at the other by the notion of “lay sociologist”. Along the spectrum are located different orientations on contemporary sociological theory. We argue that the position each author takes in relation to the capacity of agency and reflexivity is related to his or her perception of the role of sociology and of the sociologists’ work.
Key words: contemporary sociology, agency, reflexivity, cultural dope, lay sociologist.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
I grant the journal Ciências Sociais Unisinos the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the journal’s publication rules described above.